Jump to Navigation

Wilmington Employment Contract Dispute Lawyers

Having an employment contract in place does not make it enforceable. When an issue or conflict arises, employees and employers often disagree considerably regarding the meaning and scope of employment contracts. When the situation flares, experienced legal representation is imperative.

Proven Experience Negotiating And Litigating Employment Disputes In Delaware

With more than 19 years of experience in the Delaware business community, Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, provides clients with the knowledge necessary to resolve any conflict centering on an employment agreement.

Seek our assistance with any dispute involving:

  • Restrictive covenants — rights and restrictions under non-compete and confidentiality agreements
  • Employment contracts — whether an employee with a contract can be fired and what implications and obligations apply afterward
  • Shareholder agreements
  • Separation and severance agreements

  • Professional and executive contracts
  • Compensation-related contracts — equity agreements, stock option bonuses, incentive agreements, etc.

Our firm advises both employees and employers on their rights and obligations relative to the contract at issue. We develop sound strategies that align the needs and goals of our clients with the options for relief. Our lawyers are accomplished litigators, but those skills inherently involve the art of negotiation and effective communication as well. Whenever possible, we look for amicable methods of fixing the problem when such alternatives are preferable to litigation.

Before a fight ensues, we review contracts and employment agreements with clients — both employees and employers — to ensure their interests are fully protected and represented in the document. We counsel clients on the full import of an agreement's terms and conditions on their individual employment rights, bargaining power and future ability to obtain legal remedies.

Contact Our Delaware Employment Litigation Attorneys

At Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, our Wilmington employment law team is here to support you. Contact us at 302-529-0121 to arrange an in-person meeting. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs just outside the city of Wilmington, and we represent clients throughout Delaware.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy