Jump to Navigation

Wilmington Employment Law Attorneys

Dedicated Legal Representation Through Every Facet Of Your Case

At the law firm of Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, we provide legal counsel and advocacy to individuals and companies involved with many different legal problems. Clients rely on our proven practice experience, successful results and knowledge. They also count on our ability to address every consideration in their particular legal matter.

To each client, this may mean something different, including analyzing the facts and law, to addressing emotional concerns, advising on long-term projections, taking cases to trial or negotiating for the best possible outcome.

What does your legal case require? What are your needs and goals? We are here to listen and provide you with options. We are successful no matter the setting, from negotiation to mediation, arbitration and litigation.

  • Employees and employers: We have a comprehensive employment law practice that addresses all perspectives in an employment law case. Our clients are individual employees as well as employers both large and small. We are equipped to handle cases involving wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, whistleblowers, contract and agreement formation, severance agreements, disability, unemployment, benefits and pensions. Our Wilmington employment law lawyers also address any matter governed under statutes like FMLA, ADA, CEPA and ERISA.
  • Injured victims and family members: If you or a loved one was injured in a motor vehicle accident, was hurt while on private or public property, suffered due to a defective product or other types of negligence, our firm can help. We manage your personal injury claim or lawsuit so you can focus on your recovery. We have a steadfast dedication to make sure clients receive full and fair compensation.
  • Those handling the affairs of loved ones: We provide guidance to personal representatives, executors and others involved with administering the estates of loved ones who have died. When disputes arise, we also represent the litigants in will contests.
  • Nonprofit companies: We work with clients to organize not-for-profit organizations or corporations and provide counsel regarding strategies for successful operations.

Contact Our Delaware Personal Injury Lawyers

At Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, our team is here to support you. Contact us at 302-529-0121 to arrange an in-person meeting. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs just outside the city of Wilmington. Consultations for personal injury clients are always free.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy