Jump to Navigation

Wilmington Employment Lawyers

Employment Counsel In Delaware

Crafting long-term solutions for employees and employers alike is our business at Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law. Since our firm's founding, we have zealously represented the interest of our individual employee clients. Over the growth of our practice, we have also been able to add significant value to businesses managing employment law issues. The duality of our law office allows us to better serve our clients. We have a well-rounded and comprehensive view of employment law from all perspectives.

Our Wilmington employment attorneys assist clients across Delaware with matters involving the following:

Termination from employment — A litany of issues may be at play when an employee feels he or she was terminated unjustly. Our lawyers work to uncover the details of every situation and provide effective counsel in any termination case. Visit the links below for more information:

Discrimination claims — Discrimination in the workplace is expressly prohibited and governed under state and federal laws. We provide aggressive advocacy to clients dealing with these and other discrimination issues:

Benefits and claims — Employers provide group benefits that employees depend on for health care, disability, sick and family time, pensions, life insurance and more. When issues arise, having counsel from experienced lawyers is invaluable. We assist clients with all benefit-related issues, from claims, denials, appeals and lawsuits. Learn more below:

Other issues

Contact Our Delaware Labor Law Attorneys

At Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, our team is here to support you. Contact us at 302-529-0121 to arrange an in-person meeting. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs just outside the city of Wilmington.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy