Jump to Navigation

Small-Business Services

As a small-business owner, you want to be dealing with the daily operations of your company, not fumbling with the exhaustive legal problems that stand in your way. Put your time and efforts where your interests and passion lie by working with an experienced business lawyer.

From our Wilmington office, the law firm of Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, represents and advises Delaware small businesses. We are a business law firm focused on serving the needs of business clients through comprehensive and tailored legal advice and advocacy. If you need legal protection for your small business, contact us for assistance. Our founder, Martin D. Haverly, uses the knowledge and experience gained from more than 19 years in practice to help address any legal issues that arise for small businesses:

  • Dispute resolution (including negotiation, mediation, litigation)
  • General counsel services through the life of the business
  • Partnership conflicts
  • Preparation and review of business agreements, contracts, leases
  • Liability
  • Employment matters
  • Real estate litigation
  • Protection of personal and business assets

Our Wilmington attorneys for small businesses are well-versed in the business arena. We understand the needs particular to smaller companies in the area and respond with individualized counsel designed to help companies adapt to growth and change, both good and bad.

Delaware Small-Business Attorneys

Contact us to discuss your business objectives and learn how we can help you reach your goals. You can reach us at 302- 529-0121 to schedule your consultation. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs near Wilmington.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy