Jump to Navigation

Personal Injury

Personal Injury Law Attorney

Any injury can result in a severe financial and personal setback. Whether you were involved in an auto accident, suffered a broken bone or a permanent injury, it is important to seek financial compensation to address every aspect of your recovery. The lawyers at Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, are experienced lawyers focused on the needs of individuals and families adjusting to life after a serious injury or wrongful death. Our goal is to maximize your compensation so that you can work toward personal recovery after an accident or injury.

Call (302) 529-0121 today or contact me by e-mail for a free consultation. We offer experienced, strategic and compassionate legal advocacy focused on your rights and the results of your case.

We are experienced with serious injuries, including:

  • Wrongful or accidental death
  • Neck injuries and back injuries
  • Broken bones
  • Burns and bruising
  • Cuts, scarring, and lacerations
  • Spinal cord and tissue injuries
  • Disfigurement and permanent injury
  • Eye and ear injuries
  • Joint and knee injuries
  • Whiplash
  • Wrongful death

Aggressive Advocacy Focused on Your Rights and Your Recovery

Our practice focuses broadly on the issues faced by injury victims and their families. We know that recovery can be slow and difficult, especially when you are waiting for financial support. Our goal is to take swift, effective action so that you and your family can recover the full and fair compensation you need and deserve for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, long-term care needs, home modifications or wrongful death.

We know how to properly establish monetary value on a claim, negotiate a settlement or take your case to trial when necessary. At every stage, you can trust that we will have my attention on your immediate needs and future interests.

Have you been injured due to someone else's negligence? We handle a range of claims involving:

  • Dog bites
  • Motor vehicle accidents
  • Slip and fall injuries
  • Premises liability
  • Medical malpractice
  • Assault and battery
  • False imprisonment
  • Bar fights
  • Product liability
  • Toxic tort accidents

Contact Us When You Have Questions About a Personal Injury

Call (302) 529-0121 today or contact my office by e-mail to schedule an initial consultation to discuss your case. We offer free consultations on all personal injury cases, and are conveniently located safely in the Wilmington suburbs at Lancaster Pike (Rte. 48) and Centre Road (Rte. 141).

Flexible appointment schedule · Home and hospital visits upon request

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy