Jump to Navigation

Wilmington Non-Compete Agreement Attorneys

Agreements not to compete are a type of restrictive covenant used in the employment setting. Non-compete agreements are legal contracts that limit the scope of actions an employee can take after the end of an employment relationship. Such agreements prohibit the employee from competing with the former employer and include restrictions as to time, geographic area and other terms.

Both parties should be aware of their rights and obligations under a non-compete agreement. At the employment law firm of Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, we have more than 19 years of experience working on all aspects of these common contracts. While we have traditionally focused our representation on employees, we do also have a business practice that includes counseling employers on these issues.

Requirements Of Non-Compete Agreements

In general, non-compete agreements must be reasonable in their scope. Otherwise, they are susceptible to legal challenges and may be found unenforceable in court. Most often, employees are the parties challenging a non-competes limitations regarding how long or within what distance they must refrain from certain employment activities.

Strong Advocacy For All Clients In Delaware

We encourage employees to contact us regarding any issue related to a non-compete agreement. If you are being asked to sign one or have already signed one, consult with us. We will help you negotiate a fair agreement that meets the needs of all involved and protects your right to earn a living. Our Wilmington non-compete agreement lawyers can also initiate court action if the non-compete is overly broad and unreasonable. If you are being sued for violation of a non-compete, our attorneys can respond quickly and aggressively to protect you.

For employers, our business services are tailored to helping you craft and enforce sustainable agreements. The interests of your business are of paramount concern to you, and we take those matters seriously. Avoiding contract disputes, litigation or costly settlements is important, and we can take proactive steps to guide your company in the right direction.

Contact Our Delaware Confidentiality Agreement Lawyers

At Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, our team is here to support you. Contact us at 302-529-0121 to arrange an in-person meeting. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs just outside the city of Wilmington.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy