Jump to Navigation

Corporate Agreements, Liability & Disputes

Part of the business industry involves making agreements and contracts with others to get what you need. This can be risky, regardless of the level of comfort you have. Agreements can be formal and informal, but it is always important to protect yourself and your business interests.

The law firm of Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, advises a wide range of Delaware businesses and provides services such as:

  • Drafting corporate joint agreements
  • Preparing and reviewing contracts (sales, purchases, services, vendors, suppliers, etc.)
  • Negotiating and preparing commercial leases
  • Securing employee agreements

Before completing a transaction or finalizing an agreement, contact our Delaware lawyers who handle corporate agreements, liability and disputes. We will make sure you are informed, prepared and protected.

Managing Liability And Disputes

Our goal is helping clients avoid liability and exposure. This includes taking preventative steps to prevent shareholder liability, insurance liability, and contract or employment liability. With more than 19 years of experience representing Delaware companies, we know how to put effective policies and procedures into play to reduce the likelihood of future problems or to minimize liability.

If an issue is unavoidable, we respond with swift and aggressive action. This is where our extensive trial and negotiation skills are invaluable. Whatever course is necessary, we take the steps to pursue the best outcome possible. For so many clients, their business is the culmination of dreams, goals and hard work. We will not let you lose without a fight.

In addition to representing Delaware companies, we also provide local counsel services for clients who have a legal issue venued in our jurisdiction.

Corporate Law Attorneys

Contact us to discuss your business objectives and learn how our Wilmington firm can help you reach your goals. You can reach us at 302- 529-0121 to schedule your consultation. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs near Wilmington.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy