Jump to Navigation

Breach of Contract

Thriving in the business world means taking strong action to protect your interests and your company's. Engaging in contractual relationships with other companies is an integral and essential part of doing business. When a problem arises that threatens the deal, fast action can prevent further damage. Whether another party has failed in performing its contractual duties or you face a lawsuit for an alleged breach of contract, these matters deserve your attention.

Put your company in the best possible position with Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law. Our Wilmington-based firm resolves and litigates contractual disputes in myriad business scenarios. We represent businesses native to Delaware and those located in other states. Whether our lawyers handle the case directly or as local counsel, we have the legal and business savvy and experience necessary to initiate or respond to legal action.

Our plaintiff and defense services include contract issues involving:

  • Supplier and vendor contracts
  • Service or goods contracts
  • Employment contracts, noncompete agreements and severance agreements
  • Partnership disputes
  • Shareholder contracts
  • Real estate contracts

We have more than 19 years of experience catering to the unique needs of Delaware businesses and those sued under Delaware laws. Our experience has led to a deeper knowledge of solid litigation techniques, including the effectiveness of negotiation, mediation, settlement and other conflict resolution techniques. Most disputes require finding a middle ground or creatively devising one. We are capable in all facets of contract litigation, dedicated to protecting our clients' interests to ensure continued business operations.

Delaware Contract Litigation Attorneys

Contact us to discuss your business objectives and learn how our Wilmington lawyers for breach of contract can help you reach your goals. You can reach us at 302- 529-0121 to schedule your consultation. Our office is conveniently located in the suburbs near Wilmington.

View Cases

  • Sheridan v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061 (3rd Cir. 1996) (en banc) (Plaintiff's jury verdict and the "pretext only" paradigm for proof of intentional discrimination established).
  • Hawkins v. Division of State Police, et al., C.A. No. 99-297-SLR (Religious discrimination case which successfully obtained an offer of judgment and caused the State to stop using the MMPI-1.
  • Miller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C. A. No. 01-827-JJF (D.Del. 2003) (Race Discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Panaro v. J.C. Penny, Inc., C.A. 01C-02-010 JOH, 2002 WL 130692 (Del. Super. 2002)(In a personal injury case, admission into evidence of direct examination of deceased deponent/plaintiff does not.
  • Price, et al. v. L. Aaron Chaffinch, et al., C.A. No. 04-956-GMS, 2006 WL 1313178 (D.Del. 2006) (First Amendment Retaliation, Petitions Clause and Defamation Claims survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Reyes v. Freebery, 141 Fed. Appx. 49 (3d Cir. 2005) (per curiam) remanding to District Court to explain its restrictions on the public's right to access to judicial records and counsel's First Amendment.
  • Underwood v. Sear Roebuck and Co., 343 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgment).
  • Shotzberger v. State of Delaware Dept. Of Correction, 2004 WL 758354 (D.Del. Jan. 30, 2004) (Gender discrimination claim survived Motion for Summary Judgement).
  • Stull v. Thomas S. Neuberger, P.A., 2003 WL 21481016 (Del. Super. Febr. 28, 2003) (Effect of Delaware accord and satisfaction law on a contract for legal services).
View More Cases

Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy